Signal in the dev workflow
Compliance analysis runs on pull requests and tickets during review - not as a separate audit project after the fact.
For CTO
Counsel wants eyes on risky changes. Engineering wants to merge. You need shared visibility without installing a gate that slows every pull request.
Compliance analysis runs on pull requests and tickets during review - not as a separate audit project after the fact.
Lawcel does not block merges or deployments. It classifies impact and opens cases when material legal review is needed - your team decides how to act.
High-impact changes reach legal with context. Low-risk work does not flood the review queue with every routine change.
Cases tie signals to impacted documents and suggested updates - fewer ad hoc threads asking engineering to reconstruct what shipped.
GitHub, Linear, and Jira connections with webhook-driven analysis. Optional bot comments on source platforms (Starter plan and above) when you want feedback in the tools teams already use - toggle under Settings → Bot comments.
Classifications, case timelines, and resolutions are logged as work happens - useful when customers or auditors ask how compliance is operationalized.
Your workflow
Engineering leaders are asked to prove compliance keeps pace with delivery - without adding friction that slows the team down.
Lawcel ingests change signals from connected tools, scores impact, and surfaces what needs human judgment. Legal text still goes through your team review and publish flow.
Connect your stack
Install the GitHub App or connect Linear or Jira. Lawcel analyzes work as it moves through your existing toolchain.
Score and classify
Each analyzed change gets a compliance score, taxonomy tags, and a list of potentially impacted documents.
Route with context
Material impact opens a case with reasoning and suggested document patches - legal reviews substance, not raw diffs alone.
Connect your tools and get continuous compliance visibility - or start with a free scan of your public legal pages.